Some of the things I really like:

• Opening compositions show contrast – Hands growing a plant in traffic, cabbage presented on a bridge
• They used a reverse time lapse technique symbolic of grow. (reverse meaning they shot with the plant full and then cut it back they then reverse the order during playback
• The producer let her present the name of the episode live. I love that she’s not totally sure if it’s a great idea but it’s her’s and she’s “ring with it”.
•  The fact that she’s cute, a little shy and a little quirky  make it all the more real “Whole Foods Real”
• The 8mm jumpy, washed out retro film look makes me think of the good old days in an organic hippie kind of a way.
• The colors are funky but her skin tones stay beautiful.
• They seem to have shot a lot of this with a DSLR. It has nice shallow depth of field, the image is soft as apposed to video edgy and the high ISO setting also for some nice available light to show up.

I like the entire Whole Foods web series, but this video stands out as an example of a fun, well executed corporate video. Yes, corporate. They want you to forget it but they are corporate. Who says corporate video has to be boring. Not me!

During this episode John Romeo and John Holser work with script analysis using the “Agent Script” from the actor’s point of view.

We  look into:

- How and actor explores a scene for insights and clues as to what’s happening behind the dialogue.

- What the character wants or what Sanford Meisner calls it the “Super Objective”.

- We explain how the “as if” approach to working with dialogue  adds life beyond the words.

- How a lead actor must understand the characters arc and how a scene fits into that arc.

- How the filmmaker must make the actors thoughts visible.

Click here to access and read along with the script we used for this exercise. http://digitalfilmfarmworkshops.com/agent-script/

What is the difference between a super objective and a scene objective?

Answer

The super objective is what the character wants out of life. The scene objective is what the character wants from the scene or the other character. In most cases this will be what the character wants the other character to do.

A character’s objective may simply be “I want him to leave the room,”  or “I want him to kiss me.”

The most playable objectives have both a physical and an emotional component. In the case of “ wanting him to leave the room” the physical element is leaving the room or physically staying. The emotional element is the character is happy or sad he’s gone.

These objectives are fueled with actions, meaning if you want someone to leave you could <em>ask</em> them or you could <em>demand</em> they leave. Committing to an action or as Paul Newman puts it “action verbs” charges the scene with emotion and risk. These are the things that bring a scene to life.

I was exposed to the Meisner Method from Keith Eagle, a  Neighborhood Playhouse graduate and 1st generation student of Meisner. Keith was a demanding instructor and has a tremendous passion for the craft. I studied with Keith for over five years, three of which I became his teaching assistant and ultimately co-teacher for the on-camera workshops. I feel incredibly fortunate to have had this experience. I haven’t followed  Sydney Pollack’s path to Hollywood, but I have developed a solid reputation and been hired as an acting coach and director for independent films, training videos and many TV spots.

Here is a clip of Sydney Pollack describing how he entered Hollywood as an acting coach and later became one of the most respected directors ever. His Filmography includes: Out of Africa, Tootsie, The Way We Were, Electric Horseman, Absence of Malice and many more. This video begins with a photo tribute to Sydney and the actual interview starts at 1:16. If you’re interested in learning more about the Meisner approach to acting check out one of my acting workshops here.

Check more info on “The Meisner Method”  and my  Actors Workshops here.

We  explore:

- How the camera will be used to convey SUBTEXT.

-  The scene’s DRAMATIC  INTENT.

-  The scene’s SCRIPT BEATS.

-  The emotional and physical POINTS OF ACTION.

- Which character is in CONTROL and if and when it changes.

- Is there a character change, and if so, where and with whom?

Click here to access and read along with the script we used for this exercise. http://digitalfilmfarmworkshops.com/agent-script/

Check out this NAB video by – AbelCineTec

http://youtu.be/wT7gqHfBbAc

Once you have a solid grasp of the scene, you are more likely to be flexible with change, as long as the change doesn’t alter the intent of the scene or the character. Without solid understanding an important story point could be easily dropped. Some directors are so insecure in their understanding of the scene that they protect every line. Rigidly refusing to let even organic change to take place. Trying to control too much will suck the life from your scene. Understanding the intent of your scene will keep things fresh and anchored in truth.

Ten scene questions to help director’s direct.

1. What are the MAIN POINTS to get across to the audience? These are possibly answers to previous questions, new questions and points to keep the audience engaged.
2. What is the scene’s DRAMATIC  INTENT and why is it important to the screen play?
3. Where do the PLOT POINTS exist within the scene and how do they move the story forward?
4. What are the SCRIPT BEATS and how does the story change direction here?
5. What lines of dialogue contain STORY POINTS?
6. What are the emotional and physical POINTS OF ACTION?
7. Which character is in CONTROL of the scene?
8. Is there a character change, and if so, where and with whom?
9. Where is the scene’s turning point or resolution?
10. How does the scene what’s the CONCLUSION?

Here are 10 questions to help you find direction:

1. What are the MAIN POINTS to get across to the audience? These are possibly answers to previous questions, new questions and points to keep the audience engaged.
2. What is the scene’s DRAMATIC  INTENT, why is it important to the screen play?
3. Where do the PLOT POINTS exist within the scene and how do they move the story forward?
4. What are the SCRIPT BEATS and how does the story change direction here?
5. What lines of dialogue contain STORY POINTS?
6. What are the emotional and physical POINTS OF ACTION?
7. Which character is in CONTROL of the scene?
8. Is there a character change, and if so, where and with whom?
9. Where is the scene’s TURNING POINT or resolution?
10. How does the scene end and what’s the CONCLUSION?

Once you have a solid grasp of the scene you are more likely to be flexible with people who want to change dialogue. As long as a change doesn’t alter the intent of the scene or the character, this flex is ok. Without a solid understanding an important point could be easily dropped. Some directors are so insecure in their understanding of the scene that they protect these points by rigidly refusing to let bits of organic change take place. Too much control sucks all the life from a scene. Proper flexibility will keep things fresh and anchored in truth.

Check out the podcast episode where we go over these questions and analyze a scene in real time as we prepare to block. Podcast

During this episode John Holser answered a question from Jeff Burns about shooting with the Cannon 7D, 5D and syncing sound with the H4N Zoom. John Holser described workflows and practices to help with syncing sound to DSLR footage as well as describing the pros and cons to shooting with these cameras and their recording formats.  The podcast feed is available through iTunes, so sign up and stay in touch. Thank you for stopping by. We really do appreciate your support.

Links

http://www.singularsoftware.com/pluraleyes.html

PluralEyes® works with your favorite video editing tool to instantly sync all of your multi-camera video and audio tracks – eliminating complicated camera set-ups, time code, and hours of tedious manual syncing. Save time and money, reduce frustration, and free yourself to focus on the creative editing process.

____________________________

Questions from:

Jeff Burns - http://superknockedup.com/

Jessica James is the most kick-ass super-villain on the planet. But… she just got knocked up by Michael Masters – a womanizing superhero. Yikes!

http://youtu.be/fj2RJCXg8EY

Arri Lights 300, 650 - Interview setup

Regardless of whether you’re shooting a scene for your short film, capturing interior footage for a documentary, or conducting a corporate interview, location lighting can be both challenging and rewarding. It’s a rare occasion when you can point a light directly at someone and have it look good. One of the most important aspects of location lighting is to make the scene look natural—unless, of course, you are doing a sci-fi piece. The process I’ve outlined is a guide for independent, corporate, and documentary filmmakers working on a small or nonexistent budget. It will take the mystery and guesswork out of the process, allowing you to work faster and achieve better results.

As you’ll see, the evaluation steps are the same . The main difference will be the design of your final lighting plan. Bigger budgets will afford you more options but not always better results. I’ll be working hard to balance the technical side with plain language, real obstacles, and real solutions. I’ll provide links to other posts where information that is more technical is available. I’ll also be creating more posts and videos on the subject.

Overexposed kitchen - Canon 7d

Let me take a moment to acknowledge that exposure is a science and an art. What some people find acceptable and even artistic, others deem unacceptable. If the subject or objects are too bright or too dark, you won’t be able to see detail, which usually is not what you want. I’ve worked for cinematographers who even say it’s wrong to compose a shot with a large window overexposed. My feeling is that it depends on the objective of your shot. Perhaps your objective is to create a sense of vulnerability, as though there is nowhere to escape. If so, you could create a scene of a blazingly hot summer day with a main character who can’t escape the heat or the inner demons he’s hiding from. With this objective, you design a shot sequence that stays within the high end of the exposure range—meaning there are virtually no shadows, no shade, and nowhere to hide. Your main character comes in from the street; both he and the audience hope for relief, but instead, he enters a sunlit room with a large window so overexposed that it’s white. He can’t escape! The window is not properly exposed, but it creates tension and thus serves a purpose. At some point, you could cut away, have him pull the curtain, or enter a side room exposed on the middle or lower end of the exposure range. This would allow him to escape and relieves the tension created by the previous sequence.

Underexposed Kitchen - Canon 7d

This knowledge is necessary for the one shooting, but even directors and producers will benefit from a basic understanding of the tools and skills needed to control windows and practicals.  Window light is free; so learning to control levels and color temperature will save you time and money.

Evaluate the “Story Needs” of Your Shot

 You’ll need to determine how much of the environment is needed to tell your story. This will determine how wide your widest shot needs to be. This is a directorial decision that I’m not going to get into here, except to say that if the environment is an important character, or gives us specific insight, it should be worked in. How you work this in will have a huge impact on your lighting plan. Let’s say you have a man walking into a room to talk with his wife.

Video Lighting Entrance

How much of that room do we need to see? Do you need to have a shot wide enough to cover the entire walk in a full shot ? Depending on many other factors, including how stylized you want the shot to be, the setup may take longer than your available time or may simply be impossible with the lighting package at your disposal. In such a case, you could get creative and find a solution in the way you frame your shot. By framing something large in the foreground or shooting through a doorway, you’ll be able to minimize the width of the shot while still showing the man’s entrance, as well as the room. You would be staging your actors deep and shooting coverage of mostly medium shots. This solution would provide you with the opportunity to show only parts of the room, rather than the entire area. This would also give you more opportunity to hide lights and to crop out problem areas.

 If you’re shooting a sit-down interview, ask yourself how important it is to see this environment. Is it just background? If this were an artist surrounded by his or her paintings, a wide shot would be ideal—but beware; depending on the space, lighting an interview-wide shot with style means lighting the room, the objects, and the subjects. Conversely, if the location has little or nothing to do with what the interview is about, the close-up shot is fine. It’s the person and what he or she is emoting that are important. Shooting close-ups requires fewer lighting instruments and makes your lighting job a whole lot easier.

 Evaluate Existing Practicals and Windows

A large room soaks up a lot of light, so windows and practicals such as ceiling lights can be your best friend. If the furniture, curtains, or walls are dark, you will need multiple large lighting instruments to bring the light level up to an acceptable exposure.

 One of the most important decisions you’ll need to make is how you will use these existing light sources. Do you have aesthetic or practical reasons for incorporating a window in the shot? Will you incorporate existing ceiling lights, table and floor lamps, or other practicals into the frame while shooting?

Measure the brightest and darkest areas in the room. You can measure the light with a light meter, a calibrated monitor, a waveform monitor, or your camera’s viewfinder. Don’t worry about this right now. For now, it’s enough to know that light is measured. If you plan to do this alot, I strongly suggest that you learn to read with a light meter. It will save you time! I deal with reading a light meter in workshops, and I’ll eventually create a video. For now, it’s enough to know that cameras deal with f-stops, and if the f-stop of your dark areas and bright areas are too far apart, your exposure range is too wide, and many shots will be either underexposed and black or overexposed and white.

The window reads f-32 on a sunny day, and the shadow areas read f-2; that’s an exposure ratio of 8:1. The bright areas are 128 times brighter than the darkest areas and too wide to be within the acceptable exposure range of our camera. The exposure range refers to the range of light levels from brightest to darkest that our camera can capture, while maintaining texture details in the areas we want to see. This range has also been referred to as zones; most notably by photographer Ansel Adams. As a director of photography, or gaffer, you’ll need to be able to read these measuring tools and evaluate your lighting options. The alternative is a whole lot of trial and error, which takes precious time away from shooting and usually leads to inferior results.

What you’re looking to accomplish, in its simplest form, is to narrow the exposure range so that the highest and lowest light level readings are no farther apart than what your camera can handle, usually no higher than a 4:1 ratio; everything else is art and at your discretion.

Evaluate Your Tools and Your Crew

No-budget and low-budget film-making is not only about being creative, going guerrilla, or thinking out-of-the-box. It’s also about recognizing that there are limitations to what you and your crew can accomplish. Working with friends and volunteers can be fun for your first couple of productions, but when “been there and done that” gets old, your expectations will rise, and you’ll want to spend more time shooting quality footage and less time solving lighting problems. This is where the gaffer and grip come in. With very little direction, a skilled gaffer and grip team can quickly rough in a lighting plan and solve basic lighting problems while you concentrate on performance. If you haven’t been on a set with this level of skill, I recommend talking to a director who has had the pleasure of this kind of crew support. You’ll be surprised at how much more you can accomplish.

Here are some of the questions you should ask yourself before you start shooting:

                                                                                                   How “deep” is your grip and electric department?

JH & Film Crew

Deep is the term the industry uses for how many people there are within the department. Are you a “no-budget indie”?  Are you the person who is going to be both the gaffer and the grip, or are you a “low-budget indie” with a gaffer, best boy, and a key grip with a department production assistant? I know that a handful of you are thinking this sounds more like a big-budget film, but it really isn’t. I’ve worked as a gaffer and grip on many low-budget independent films that have been at least two deep in each department. This was just enough personnel,with a reasonable amount of locations and equipment—although not enough on the jobs with plenty of equipment and an overambitious director.

How many setups do you need to do per day?

flags, nets and lights

Making good decisions about what is reasonable comes with experience. I’ll be posting more on this, but I urge you to overestimate how much you’re planning to do, and do it well. You’ll have a better movie, and your crew will be more likely to help you again. At some point, you’re doing a disservice to the crew, your movie, and the independent film-making industry by underestimating the job requirements and continually asking crew to work 14 to 16 hours. It’s not safe, and it’s not sustainable. Learn from your mistakes, and make the necessary changes. See my post on working with experienced and inexperienced crew.

Do you have the right amount of grip and lighting gear for the setups?

Without going into detail on how to match this up, the basic idea is that you don’t want a full lighting truck and only two crew members to set up, adjust, break down, and carry the equipment back to the truck. It also doesn’t make sense to have a large department if you have three lights. If you’ve done the location scouting, you know what your challenges are. You need enough gear to tackle your most complicated lighting setup. This can be predetermined with basic lighting and light-meter reading knowledge. Will you need gels or screens to control or color the light coming through the windows? Do you have stands and flags to help you control light? Do you have a bead board or foam core to help you bounce light, or diffusion to help you soften light? How about a ladder, sand bags, or apple boxes? These are just a few of the things, that combined with people who know how to use them, will help you create a beautiful scene.

What is the lighting plan?

You’ve had the opportunity to evaluate the needs of your shot, physical characteristics of the location, existing practicals and windows, lighting gear and the ability of your crew. It’s time to create a lighting plan and for our purposes, we’ll assume that this is a no-budget film or documentary style shoot and that you have one person working as the gaffer and the grip.

In our example, our brightest area is f32, which is 128 times brighter than our darkest area; an f2.  This yields an exposure ratio of an 8:1 light ratio. This means that if we expose our subject using the brightest area, a large portion of the shot will be extremely dark; conversely, if we expose our person at the levels based on the darkest area, the shot will be too bright and the window will be severely overexposed. We’re working with a small lighting package and don’t have the time to gel the windows neatly enough for the gel to look like it’s the windowpane; thus, we need to exclude the window from the shot.

                                                                               What can we do?

ND gel on window

We can tape a full orange (full CTO) as well as a neutral density gel (ND9) over the window, not worrying about hiding it. This is a quick fix, but as the gels will be draped over the window, we’ll be unable to frame a wide shot that includes the window. This will reduce the light by four stops (F11) and change the light color from daylight to tungsten, more closely matching the lights in our kit. We’re now working with a 5:1 lighting ratio. Next, we’ll place some white foam core on the floor, letting the window light reflect off it. We’ll turn on our existing practicals and aim our largest light at the white ceiling. With our base exposure range up from an F2 to an F 2.8, our ratio is reduced to 4:1. This is larger than we want, but it’s at a level that our light kit can work at.  At this level, we can accent the back wall, diffuse the key light, and create a bounced edge. The area the actors are in is large enough to fit three characters, staged deep instead of wide, and reads an f4, f5.6, and f8 within the area of motion. This puts the exposure for our actors right in the middle of our exposure range. The trick in this situation was framing our shot to contain the action, but not the window, by staging the actors deep. We also recognized that we had a small crew and very few lights, so we worked with the window light coming into the room and adapted our setup to work with the lights we had.

If you want to become better at lighting, pay attention to the lighting around you and the way it changes throughout the day. Begin to notice whether the light in the room makes you feel gloomy or happy. Create a frame in your mind or with your hands, and note the bright spots and shadow areas. Pay attention to people’s faces and the way they look next to windows, next to table lamps, under overhead fluorescent lights and in the numerous other scenarios that exist. Find reality lighting designs that you’ll want to replicate or be influenced by. Keep in mind however, that the human eye has a larger exposure range than a photographed image has. Humans can deal with a 10:1 exposure ratio; most cameras cannot.

It’s possible to light with purpose. But like everything else it starts with intention.

Join the forum discussion on this post

I believe filmmaking is a team sport, so I’m assuming you are working with a small or large crew. On the best productions crew members have a copy of the the day’s shooting script and accompanying shot-list. This list will be used by department heads to determine what they need to prepare and when it will be seen in the shot. They know this because everyone uses the same language. There are some variations but the terms are easy to understand and cross over easily.

cinema close shot

Cinema medium shot

Tim Wuolle

Broadcast Media Professional-Available for Freelance

Phoenix, Arizona Area 

Broadcast Media

I was approached to do freelance work on a government project. They want me to shoot and edit using all of my own equipment. I’m using wireless mics, lights, Sony NX5U HD cam, and FCP to edit on my mac. They want me to give them an hourly rate plus a day rate. There is also travel involved( flight).  I want to charge the going rate. Also, what travel expenses should be included? Any help would be great. Thanks!

Tim Wilson • There’s only one way to figure out what to charge: figure out how much your services cost to provide, and charge more than that.

“The going rate” has nothing to do with it. Neither does your level of experience or the kind of client. If you can’t make more than you spend then change your expenses, change your rate, or find another job.

I hate to sound harsh, but the only way for any business to survive is to make more than you spend.

Some thoughts:

1) If you’re a freelancer getting paid hourly, you’ll never get paid for every hour. Standing in line at the bank, writing invoices, cleaning your desk, talking on the phone, etc. – you’ll be lucky to actually bill half the hours in a week.

2) This is why I agree that half-day rates are more trouble than they’re worth. Besides, once you count up winding down what you’re working on, loading your stuff in the car, setting up, tearing down, traveling back — your half day shoot is 2 hours MAX. If the client expects a 4-hour shoot to equal half a day, that’s nuts. It costs you more like six hours, even if you’re just driving across town.

3) On to the real math. Count up your actual costs for everything – work-related car expenses, liability insurance, consumables (disks, tapes, light bulbs, etc.), phone bills, electricity…

…and then food, health insurance, life insurance, your car, your house, your kids, TV, movies, clothes.

Now, take all of that, and divide it by 20 hrs/wk, which is the number of hours that you should assume to be safe.

Let’s get THEORETICAL. If it costs $50,000 to do all that, and you want to work 50 wks/yr, you need $1000/wk to meet my target. 1000/20 hrs = $50/hr. To break even.

Now add up how often you want to refresh your gear. A new computer every x years, new software, new chair, whatever. That’s another $5-10/hr.

Oops, taxes. If you need $60/hr just to cover your expenses, you need to add another 25-30% to cover your nut – you’re now looking at $75-80/hr.

Want to put anything in savings? IRA? Better to start when you’re young. If you want to set aside 10% of your income, you’re now looking $80-90/hr in the face.

That’s why I say that experience, client, the going rate mean nothing. At the end of the day, no matter what your career, your actual job is making more than you spend.

Now, if you’re in a position where the going rate is a hard ceiling…and it might be…do all of that math in reverse. Can you make a living at the going rate? It’s easy math.

On to the specifics of the original question: government work is tough to budget for. My primary clients as a producer were NOAA, Everglades National Park, and EPA. I charged them differently for a long-term contract than I did the state police for a one-off.

I had a colleague who was a civilian contractor for DoD – he made as much for one job as I made in a year. If either of us had pitched the other’s client with the rates we’d originally charged our own clients, we’d both have been laughed out of the room.

If you can’t ask the budget up front, or it’s one of those “you tell ME the budget, and I’ll get the money allocated” kind of deals, then do the math I talked about earlier in this post. If the job is rock-solid for more than 20 hrs/week, adjust accordingly.

In any case, it’s your job to figure out how much it costs you to stay in business. Charge more than that.

—-http://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&gid=36719&type=member&item=62976223&commentID=-1#lastComment

To see  more production setups and final product click here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGd7sPqg6PA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGbj93qNXgg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ2uXeNCgFM

Sign up for our newsletter to stay informed of bonus clips and filmmaker tips!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biFn9qko734

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHdIqIboQB0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9pY2Z5Sv98 

Creating new videos for the front page of this site seems to be a no-brainer. Right? I wish!! Like everyone else with design and content questions, I need to weigh the benefits and costs. I need to decide who is my target market, what emotions should I evoke and how much product information will satisfy their left-brain enough to make the ever important next mouse click. I’ve seen far too many cookie cutter designs that range from very adequate to down right terrible. Most of these are crammed with information and fail to capture the personality of the business or featured product. I’ve created quality videos so my clients know that I know the difference. Creating this kind of will takes many hours; hours I’m not able to bill a client for.  So, after a little internal kicking and some internal whining,  I have decided (at least for now) to create three new videos. I have a lot of footage to log, edit, re-edit, and re-edit (see screen capture) without any guaranteed success. This will take three to five weeks and will either come at a cost of turning away work or hiring temporary help. Allocating this much unbillable time is very difficult. But it is time I practice what I preach and put my best foot forward. I know I’ll be happy in the end. Here we go!!! I’ll keep you in the loop. Oh, and thanks to my wife who said, “You’re worth it. It’s the foundation of your business. Now get to work.”

With new skills in hand I went to market, thinking I would surely set the world on fire and while I found many exciting projects and opportunities, I found even more situations that required me to compromise. These compromises never forced me to put out crap, but I did do my share of polishing and had numerous periods of creative boredom. Thankfully, during this boredom I learned to find creativity in efficiencies, workflows and client relations.

I decided to start this blog and share these experiences as a way for me to once again fire up the “student” passion I have for this business.

I have never stopped learning but as I integrate teaching into my work life I find myself inspired to sharpen my skills and strengthen some underused creative muscles. If you are reading these words, please know I appreciate that your are a part of this “writer/reader” equation and ask for any feedback, criticism, encouragement or general subject banter you would be kind enough to reciprocate.

Veteran actors will know how to make playable choices. This leaves the director with the job of determining if these choices support the character’s spine and arch of the scene as he the director sees it. Novice actors may not know how to make playable choices, thus the director’s job will require more energy as he helps the actor uncover possible choices for themselves.

During this process you are looking for choices that are objective, playable and that engage the actor’s subconscious. Inspired by the script they are secrets, gateways into the subconscious world. This choice must be so simple, so compelling and so present that the actor need not step out of the moment to find it.

The best way to derive playable choices is to ask questions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa7BtUiZ79Y

I was exposed to the Meisner Method by Keith Eagle, a Neighborhood Playhouse graduate and 1st generation student of Meisner. Keith was a demanding instructor and has a tremendous passion for the craft. I studied with Keith for over five years. I became his teaching assistant during three of those years and ultimately co-teacher for the on-camera workshops. I feel incredibly fortunate to have had this experience. I haven’t followed  Sydney Pollack’s path to Hollywood, but I have developed a solid reputation and have been hired as an acting coach and director for independent films, training videos and many TV spots.

Here is a clip of Sydney Pollack describing how he entered Hollywood as an acting coach and later became one of the most respected directors ever. His filmography includes: Out of Africa, Tootsie, The Way We Were, Electric Horseman, Absence of Malice and many more.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xV34RIrAvW4

What is the difference between a super objective and a scene objective?

Answer:

The super objective is what the character wants out of life. The scene objective is what the character wants from the scene or the other character. In most cases this will be what the character wants the other character to do.

A character’s objective may simply be “I want him to leave the room,”  or “I want him to kiss me.”

The most playable objectives have both a physical and an emotional component. In the case of “ wanting him to leave the room”,  the physical element is leaving the room or physically staying. The emotional element is the character is happy or sad he’s gone.

These objectives are fueled with actions; meaning that if you want someone to leave you could ask them or you could demand they leave. Committing to an action (or as Paul Newman puts it, “action verbs”) charges the scene with emotion and risk. These are the things that bring a scene to life.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNuFSrsYfpM

How do I create a structure that makes a performance repeatable while preserving “moment by moment” emotional truth?

Answer:

Develop tools and work with actors to confirm or uncover meaningful, energetic choices that support the emotional life of their characters.

Directors often set out with the desire to learn the “actors language” but often adopt “director jargon” leaving them with very limited and misguided communication tools. Human behavior cannot be reduced to jargon.  It is a language we must understand and speak with confidence.

In the late 1890’s Constantine Stanislavski charged that the established training and directing methods prepared actors to stereotype and “pose.” He claimed this did not represent human behavior. He believed, and many others later confirmed, that if an actor commits to a character’s spine and a playable choice rather then a particular voice inflection or “line-timed facial gesture” the actor’s performance, and ultimately the movie, would be better. Sanford Meisner put it this way “Acting is the ability to live truthfully under the given imaginary circumstances.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSCUx9Tnb_A